To tell the truth, I visited http://honyaks.crazyrocket.net a few times, hoping there would be something new to draw me in on each visit, but there wasn’t. I’m not saying this blog is terrible, because it isn’t, but there is nothing there, no spark, no extra allure that differentiates this blog from the multitude already out there.
The writing is technically pretty good– there are no horrendous spelling or grammar errors, and it is coherent and somewhat amusing, but for a site that’s slogan is “a site of style and humor for the uncool,” it is sadly lacking in both regards.
Most entries have at least one link with commentary, and the commentary simply isn’t that funny. Even when it is straightforward, the writing is not particularly interesting.
The blog also lacks style in web design. It uses a Moveable Type template that while easily navigable, further quagmires it with the blogging masses. It also lacks any other pages to entice the reader, and I had a hard time staying interested.
In short, http://honyaks.crazyrocket.net is nothing special. But it could be, if some more personality were shown.
Chemo Warfare
Review 1758
Wow, does Epicycle know his computers! This website is a refuge for anyone who knows each wire in his CPU. The design and layout of the site is easy to navigate in a simple no-frills way. Much like the computers Epicycle loves, everything has it’s place on his website. Part blog, part ode to all things computer, this techie has a lot of good information on his website for other techies.
I personally know next to nothing about the innards of my computer, but despite this I had fun clicking through Epicycle’s website because he offers other things as well – pictures of space models and some digital art, to name a couple.
There is very little personal information at Epicycle, but that’s not the intent of the site – it’s not a personal blog. It’s a computer blog, and so in that regard it’s near perfect because each and every entry goes into detail about something computer-oriented.
I would have given it a 5 but for a couple links that brought up empty pages under construction. If it had been a completed site, it would have been the perfect computer site.Epicycle
Review 1235
The layout of militant veggie (no caps, as per the owner’s entry) is very simple. The green on white is relatively easy on the eyes, and given the “veggie” part of the site’s name, makes sense. Links to a wide variety of stuff are to the right.
The name “militant veggie” had me expecting something fairly witty, and it delivered. There aren’t many entries on the main page, but never fear, the archives have it covered. There is a complete lack of capital letters, which might annoy some people, but it doesn’t detract from the writing style in my opinion.
Fun extras on the sidebar include an “about” page wherein the author’s favorites are listed by each of the five senses, photography (some by the author, some not), and two sub-blogs. One is dedicated to music, the other to “little things.”
Overall, this is an interesting little blog that is good for a quick glance at the author’s life. If you were to run across it by accident, you might just as swiftly pass it by, but it’s worth taking the time to look around it.militant veggie
Review 1756
The first thing that struck me about honyaks was that the post titles are, to me at least, unreadable with out highlighting. They are a small, bold, red font on a grey background, and make my eyes go all blurry when reading them…ok so post titles are not the most important thing about a blog, but it is a design fault the author, dairyair, might want to keep in mind.
Reading the blog itself, there isn’t much to it. Entries come once or twice a day, every few days, and consist mostly of links with a few words of description. However, sometimes this description is not incredibly informative.
The site design (besides the post titles) is simple and functional, but there is nothing special about it. When combined with the relatively average writing, and complete lack of other content (not even an ‘about me’ page), it is hard to recommend this site, unless you like reading blogs as a way of finding links to other sites.Chemo Warfare
Review 1417
There’s a lot to this site, all of which can be navigated through with the menu box along the side of the weblog frame. I was able to learn a great deal about Scott just by checking out those available links.
The site layout works well in any screen resolution, and all the links in the menu box to the side opened up in the center frame just as they were should. Sometimes the gray text was a bit hard to read on the slightly lighter gray background, but overall, Scott does a good job with it.
The archived section is set up rather uniquely. You can personally decide which way you’d like to go through the archives of the site, which would be very convenient if you were looking for something in particular that dealt with a specific subject matter.
I stereotype very badly when it comes to reading weblogs that belong to anyone under the age of 18. I only stereotype from having had dreadful experiences with those types of weblogs. Scott and the entire Psypheria site proved my stereotyping to be dead wrong in this case.
I like Scott’s satirical nature when discussing worldly events. He obviously follows the news somewhat, and has intelligent thoughts and opinions that he wants to share. Scott’s a Dilbert fan, and frequently shares Dilbert cartoons with his readers.
There was an issue I read in the archives of the site about Scott supposedly “dumbing things down” for his readers, or to not appear so intelligent to the outside world. But just as Scott’s response to the issue says: “If you don’t like my ideas, or how I write, stop reading.
This is a good weblog to read. You learn a ton about the author just through reading the journal entries, and that makes readers (myself included) want to come back and read more.
PsyBlog