The blog title is “Secret Knowledge of Backroads”, something I found quite mysterious, conveying very unusual imagery. The description is amusing: “if it wasn’t for disappointment i wouldn’t have any appointments” (though “weren’t” is the form of “to be” that should be used in an If Clause, just had to point that out). Very nice start.
Backroads loads a simple, green blogspot template, nothing fancy regarding design. The side bar is to the right and it carries the usual blog/links section and previous posts plus a poll and current listening/reading. There was no “about” section I could find, either in the form of a blogger profile or separate page. I gathered the author wishes to remain anonymous, yet an “about” section adds the desired author-reader connection and the lack of it can be disappointing to many a blog reader.
Backroads’ entries are of a diverse nature. He will comfortably give his expertise on music in many of his posts, while in others he will digress on a series of topics regarding his everyday experiences (I enjoyed his Peter Gabriel Concert entry of June 9) or opinions on matters such as shopping, blogging, etc. It’s hard to pinpoint the exact nature of the blog as 1. The average reader will know little about the author at first glance and what he/she will know will be learned from the archives (which is not something most readers are prepared to do) 2. The nature of his posts vary.
These in themselves are not bad things if the blog is intended as a strictly personal outlet. But once a blog is submitted to a site such as this, the reviewer understands that the author seeks exposure for his blog and/or wishes to gain some information on how to make his blog more appealing, but again, more appealing to whom? Hence, the question is the same, the author seeks to be read.
With this in mind I can say a couple of things.
1. Backroads needs an about page or some section providing information about him.
2. While his writing is very enjoyable and his music expertise, impressive (I liked his take on Jeff Buckley), Backroads is at his best when he posts longer digressions on what interests him (be it music, ranting or what not). These by far, are the most enjoyable entries. Other entries are pictures with no text which may seem incomprehensible to the average reader (though I found them appealing, giving insight to what Backroads’ character may be like).
3. Also, and this is purely of a very subjective nature, though the blog title and description are unique, it may not reflect the feel of the blog. One might consider the author to be of a pensive, even dark nature, which he is not. Again, this right here is a matter of my cohesive thinking, nothing more.
4. Blogger comment options are terrible to use. Backroads could try another free service which would make interaction with his readers easier.
Ok, with this out of the way, I’d like to finish with an overall impression of the blog.
I liked it very much. And I mean very, very much. It is one of those blogs that I would add to my blogroll. As a reviewer one may rate a blog highly yet not add it to one’s favorites or blogroll, yet with this blog it is different. It appealed to me and I got the impression that Backroads is intelligent, musically savvy, witty and a whole lot of fun. It made me smile. I can only expect good things from this blog in the future (seeing how far it’s come since its recent birth), and I will keep my fingers crossed for the about page.
secret knowledge of backroads