This review of bandersnatch is brought to you by The Weblog Review blog and website reviews. Get your site reviewed within 4 days by using the 'For Faster Service' link on the left menu.
bandersnatch
well I'm going on a short hiatus so I thought I might do something brash before I leave hence reviewing my own website.
Well let's begin.
the design (done by the maker of sasquatchamo.waferbaby.com)or phil d is really good in my opinion on my suggestion he made the pixily art (which if you see tells the story of a twisted romance gone wrong). The design isn't what is wrong with my site. First of all (you will know this if you read my reviews) my spelling and grammer really, really take away from the quality of my essays and poems, it often irks people mabye to the pt of dissuading them from coming back. However many a time the spelling and grammer errors are intentional to drive away people who are too buzy checking those to look at the actual content. but even I'll admit it is often times very annoying. Another thing about this site that could be improved apon is NOT writing crap, some of my really horrible essays offend people so much that they won't look for the good ones . I've managed to offset this problem by deleating many of those but still.
One of the most overlooked sections for webloggers is the poetry page where through persuasion I've managed to obtain many a poets contributions (including the esteemed ann arbor poet molly raynor) and others. This is in my pt by far the most interesting part of my site. A flaw that was my fault not the sites was my using it as a form to vent my anger at specific people. But through seeing what it's done and the feedback i've gotten I've curbed this as well. I think I can honestly say these things because it isn't shameless self promotion it's honestly how I feel towards my site and as I grow I only feel it's potential and quality will grow with me. But as long as in essays and logs I remain immature than my site will also only be this way.
But I encorage you to go to my site and tell me if you thought this review was accurate or hogslop
thank you for your time
This site was reviewed on 2001-07-27 by hoatzin.
They felt this site belonged in the Teen category.
hoatzin felt that bandersnatch deserved a rating of 3.25.
Matt's weblog is a little unusual in that it takes the form of a separate journal as part of his site, rather than simply being on the front page like so many others. I don't think that this is a particularly wise move either; the first thing people want to see when they go to someone's blog is to see the blog. Archives can be moved off into a new section, but it is better, in my opinion, to show the key content right from the off.
When you do find the journal (which is grouped by day, reverse chronologically), it is well written and absorbing. The writer (himself an aspiring novellist/playwright) comes across as intelligent, although if he spent a bit more time and effort on grammar and spelling the end result would be far more satisfying.
You have to put in some work to get much from this site, and in the six-second world of the Internet, far too many people will be going off-site for their content without really exploring the site. It is worth visiting, and shows some promise.
This site was reviewed on 2001-07-24 by chrisw.
They felt this site belonged in the Teen category.
chrisw felt that bandersnatch deserved a rating of 3.25.
2 reviewers gave bandersnatch an average rating of 3.2500
Site Stats
Site Category: Teen
Reader Rating: 0.0000 based on votes
Report URL
Cast your vote
Sorry you need to log in to vote.